D.A.B. et al v. New York City Department of Education
Plaintiff: D.A.B. and M.B.
Defendant: New York City Department of Education
Case Number: 1:2012cv04325
Filed: June 1, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #104833. The plaintiffs' claim under New York Education Law is dismissed without prejudice. Because each of the plaintiffs' claims have now been dismissed, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint and closing this case. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/2/2014) (rjm) Modified on 10/3/2014 (ca).
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 48 OPINION AND ORDER re: 38 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by New York City Department of Education, 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Section 504 Allegations filed by D.A.B., M.B. The Court has cons idered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, they are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained above, the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the Section 504 claim is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to close all pending motions. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/22/2014) (mro)
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER re: 14 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment and In Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. filed by New York City Department of Education, 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by D.A.B., M.B. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, they are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained above, the defendants motion for summary judgment on the IDEA claim is granted. The plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the IDEA claim is denied. The Clerk is directed to close docket nos. 12 and 14. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/14/2013) (djc) Modified on 9/16/2013 (djc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: D.A.B. et al v. New York City Department of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: D.A.B.
Represented By: Gregory Cangiano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: M.B.
Represented By: Gregory Cangiano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Department of Education
Represented By: Elizabeth Sheehan Edmonds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?