United States of America v. One Tyrannosaurus Bataar Skeleton
| United States of America |
| One Tyrannosaurus Bataar Skeleton |
| Eric Prokopi |
| 1:2012cv04760 |
| June 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| P. Kevin Castel |
| Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The time for claimant to reply on the motion to dismiss is stayed. By September 21, 2012, the government shall either amend its Verified Complaint, for which leave is granted, or state that it does not wish to amend and stands o n the existing pleading. Either the existing pleading, if the government elects to stand on it, or the amended pleading, if the government elects to amend, will be assumed to be the government's strongest effort to plead a claim for relief consi stent with the known facts and this circumstance will be take into account in the event there is an application to further replead. If the government elects to stand on its existing Verified Complaint, then claimant's reply brief will be due Sep tember 26,2012. If the government elects to amend, then, by October 5, 2012, claimant may either answer the amended Verified Complaint or move to dismiss. If a motion is filed, the government shall respond by October 19,2012 and the claimant may reply by October 30, 2012. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/7/2012) (cd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
