Shrenuj USA, LLC v. Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Shrenuj USA, LLC
Defendant: Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. and R. Klein Jewelry & Co., Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv04827
Filed: June 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Jesse M. Furman
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER re: 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Shrenuj USA, LLC: For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED, its motion for spoliation sanctions is GRANTED (except that the Court defers the q uestion of what sanction to impose to the time of trial), and its motion for a severance is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, the claims against Klein, which are stayed by virtue of his bankruptcy, are severed from the other claims an d cross-claims, which shall be tried together. The parties shall immediately advise the Court by joint letter if they are interested in having a settlement conference before the assigned Magistrate Judge for purposes of settlement. Regardless, withi n thirty days of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, the parties shall submit to the Court for its approval a Joint Pretrial Order prepared in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3) and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices . The parties should follow Paragraph 5 of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices, which identifies submissions that must be made at or before the time of the Joint Pretrial Order, including any motions in limine. At or before the same date, the parties shall also file joint requests to charge, joint proposed verdict forms, and joint proposed voir dire questions in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules and Practices. Jury instructions may not be submitted after the Joint Pre trial Order due date, unless they meet the standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 51(a)(2)(A). The parties shall be ready for trial approximately two weeks after the Joint Pretrial Order is filed. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 36. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 3/25/2014) (tn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shrenuj USA, LLC v. Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shrenuj USA, LLC
Represented By: Patrick Papalia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc.
Represented By: Kieran Xavier Bastible
Represented By: Thomas Richard Slome
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Klein Jewelry & Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?