Smith v. The City of New York et al
Mark A. Smith |
The City of New York and John Doe |
1:2012cv04890 |
June 20, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Kings |
Unassigned |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER re: 29 FIRST MOTION for Reconsideration re; 27 Memorandum & Opinion filed by Leonardo Nimo, The City of New York: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket No. 29. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order to the pro se Plaintiff. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 12/16/2013) (tn) |
Filing 27 OPINION AND ORDER re: 21 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss filed by Leonardo Nimo, The City of New York. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, but Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before December 20, 2013, fo r the sole purpose of alleging a malicious prosecution claim against both Defendants that is consistent with this Opinion and Order. Plaintiff is encouraged to review this Order carefully and contact the Pro Se Office of this Court for assistance in amending his Complaint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motion at docket number 21., ( Amended Pleadings due by 12/20/2013.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 11/20/2013) (lmb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.