Erickson Beamon Ltd. v. CMG Worldwide, Inc. et al
| Erickson Beamon Ltd. |
| CMG Worldwide, Inc. and The Estate of Better Davis |
| 1:2012cv05105 |
| June 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Naomi Reice Buchwald |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons in this Memorandum and Order, Erickson Beamon's motion to dismiss defendants' affirmative defenses and counterclaims is granted in part and denied in part. This Memorandum and Order resolves docket number 49, and as further set forth. Granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion to Dismiss. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 8/12/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rjm)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 28 Motion to Enjoin Defendants from Prosecuting Indiana Action; denying 33 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. For the aforementioned reasons, defendants' motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to sta y or transfer is denied. Plaintiff's motion to enjoin the prosecution of the Indiana action is also denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at docket nos. 28 and 33. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 9/25/2013) (ft)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
