Howard v. Freedman et al
| John D. Howard |
| Ann Freedman, Glafira Rosales, Knoedler Gallery, LLC, Michael Hammer, 8-31 Holdings, Inc., Jose Carlos Bergantinos Diaz and Jaime R. Andrade |
| 1:2012cv05263 |
| July 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Paul G. Gardephe |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
397
ORDER for 395 Report and Recommendations. Judge Pitman's July 21, 2016 R & R (Dkt. No. 395) is adopted by this Court. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff as against Defendants Glaf ira Rosales and Carlos Bergantinos Diaz, jointly and severally, in the amount of $10.5 million, plus prejudgment interest on $3.5 million at a rate of 9% per annum from June 13, 2007 to the date of entry of judgment. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to terminate any outstanding motions and to close this case. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/28/2016) (kl)
|
|
Filing
235
ORDER denying 87 Motion to Strike. For all the foregoing reasons, Hammer's motion to strike (Docket Item 87) is denied in all respects. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this item closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 3/12/2014) Copies Sent By Chambers. (ajs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
