Wingate v. Robert N. Davoren Center et al
| Chris Wingate |
| John Doe and City of New York |
| 1:2012cv05521 |
| July 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Andrew L. Carter |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 10 MOTION to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth above, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in-part and DENIED in-part. Defendant City of New York is DISMISSED from this case. Plaintiff's § 1983claim agains t Defendants John Does 1-3 for allegedly violating his Fourteenth Amendment rights survives Defendants' Motion. The Court notes, while not relied upon in deciding this Motion, Plaintiff offered additional facts in his opposition that were not in cluded in the Complaint. For instance,Plaintiff argued the temperature was "well into the high 90'seven 100[,]" "there was a work order for the inoperable window before [he] reached Rikers Island[,]" and he suffered "nos e bleeds[.]" (Pl.'s Opp. 1.) The Court will hold a telephone status conference with the parties on October 3, 2013 at 11:30 a.m. to address amending the Complaint to include these facts and ascertaining the identities of the John Doe defendants. so Ordered (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/10/2013) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (js) Modified on 9/11/2013 (js).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
