Indian Harbor Insurance Company v. The City of San Diego

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Indian Harbor Insurance Company v. The City of San Diego

Indian Harbor Insurance Company v. The City of San Diego

Plaintiff:	Indian Harbor Insurance Company
Defendant:	The City of San Diego
Case Number:	1:2012cv05787
Filed:	July 27, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 25, 2013	Filing 91 OPINION AND ORDER re: 50 MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by Indian Harbor Insurance Company. For the reasons explained above, the City's notice to Indian Harbor of the Grande North, 235 on Market, and Centex Claims was untimely. Indian Har bor has therefore established that it is entitled to declaratory judgment of no duty to indemnify the City as a matter of law for these claims. To the extent not specifically addressed above, all other arguments raised by the parties are either moot or without merit. Accordingly, Indian Harbors motion for summary judgment is granted. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 50. Indian Harbor is directed to submit a proposed judgment within four days of the date of this opinion. The defendants may submit any objections or counter-judgments two days thereafter. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/25/2013) (djc) Modified on 9/25/2013 (djc).

Date Filed

Document Text

September 25, 2013

Filing 91 OPINION AND ORDER re: 50 MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by Indian Harbor Insurance Company. For the reasons explained above, the City's notice to Indian Harbor of the Grande North, 235 on Market, and Centex Claims was untimely. Indian Har bor has therefore established that it is entitled to declaratory judgment of no duty to indemnify the City as a matter of law for these claims. To the extent not specifically addressed above, all other arguments raised by the parties are either moot or without merit. Accordingly, Indian Harbors motion for summary judgment is granted. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 50. Indian Harbor is directed to submit a proposed judgment within four days of the date of this opinion. The defendants may submit any objections or counter-judgments two days thereafter. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/25/2013) (djc) Modified on 9/25/2013 (djc).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Indian Harbor Insurance Company v. The City of San Diego
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Indian Harbor Insurance Company
Represented By:	Max H. Stern
Represented By:	Jessica E. Lalonde
Represented By:	Christine Megna Van Gelder
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: The City of San Diego
Represented By:	Christine Marie Leone
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?