Shafir v. Continuum Health Care Partners, Inc.
Leigh Shafir |
Continuum Health Care Partners, Inc. |
1:2012cv05794 |
July 27, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 1/15/2016) (kgo) |
Filing 31 OPINION re: 21 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Class Action Complaint. filed by Continuum Health Care Partners, Inc., St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center. Defendants Continuum Health Partners, Inc. and St. L uke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center move to dismiss Plaintiff Leigh Shafir's Third Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). For the following reasons herein, I will convert that motion to one for summary judgment under Fed. R . Civ. P. 56. Accordingly, the parties may take additional discovery by no later than December 5, 2014, and submit any supplemental supporting material to me by no later than December 15, 2014. (Signed by Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum on 10/21/2014) (kgo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.