Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg Spencerview Asset Management Limited et al v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
Plaintiff: |
Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg Spencerview Asset Management Limited and Caledonian Trust (Cayman) Limited |
Defendant: |
Capital One Financial Corporation, Capital One, National Association, Chevy Chase Funding LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA), LLC |
Case Number: |
1:2012cv05907 |
Filed: |
August 2, 2012 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Office: |
Foley Square Office |
County: |
New York |
Presiding Judge: |
Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Contract |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
July 17, 2013 |
Filing
23
OPINION re: (10 in 1:12-cv-05909-MGC) MOTION to Remand to State Court NOTICE OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY filed by Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg, (6 in 1:12-cv-05911-MGC) MOTION to Reman d to State Court NOTICE OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY filed by Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg Spencerview Asset Management Limited, Caledonian Trust (Cayman) Limited, (10 in 1:12-cv-05907- MGC) MOTION to Remand to State Court NOTICE OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY filed by Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg Spencerview Asset Management Limited, Caledonian Trust (Cayman) Limited. These are three related actions, all removed from the Supreme Court of New York County. The defendants were all involved in the securitization of mortgages and their sale to the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs assert common law claims of misrepresentation in the offering materials. Defendants have removed the cases to this Court on the ground that the claims are governed by federal law, 12 U.S.C. 632, a section added in 1933 to the Edge Act of 1919. Plaintiffs have moved to remand all three actions. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs motion is granted. For the foregoing reasons plaintiffs motions to remand are granted. The Clerk is directed to return this case with all of its papers to the Supreme Court of New York County. Case closed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum on 7/17/2013) (rsh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?