Bailey Shipping Limited v. American Bureau of Shipping et al
Bailey Shipping Limited |
American Bureau of Shipping, American Bureau of Shipping Hellas, Martha C. Adams, Ioannis Armenakis, Christos Lambrou and Pantelis Kalapetis |
1:2012cv05959 |
August 3, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Richard J. Sullivan |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 OPINION AND ORDER re: 85 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award dated April 19, 2018 filed by American Bureau of Shipping. For the reasons set forth above, Petitioner's motion to confirm the Final Award is GRANTED. The Clerk of C ourt shall enter judgment for Petitioner and against Respondent in the amount of $168,090.19. Post-judgment interest will accrue at the statutory rate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 5/1/2019) (rro) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. |
Filing 61 OPINION AND ORDER re: 42 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas Seeking Testimony in an Arbitration of Atlantic Bank of New York filed by Atlantic Bank of New York, 47 MOTION to Compel Atlantic Bank of New York to to comply with subpoena duce s tecum filed by American Bureau of Shipping Hellas, American Bureau of Shipping, Pantelis Kalapetis, Christos Lambrou, Martha C. Adams, Ioannis Armenakis: For the reasons set out above, ABNY's motion to quash the subpoena is DENIED and Defendants' motion to compel compliance is GRANTED. The stay in this action imposed on August 27, 2012, remains in place pending arbitration. Bailey and ABS are reminded of the Court's requirement in its March 28, 2014 Order that they submit a joint letter by July 28, 2014, and every 120 days thereafter, advising the Court of the status of the arbitration. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 7/18/2014) (tn) |
Filing 40 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set out above, Baileys petition to vacate the arbitral award is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Docket Entry 33. The stay in this action imposed on August 27 , 2012, remains in place pending arbitration. The parties are hereby ORDERED to submit a joint letter by July 28, 2014, and every 120 days thereafter, advising the Court of the status of the arbitration. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 3/28/2014) (ajs) (Main Document 40 replaced on 3/28/2014) (ajs). |
Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER. Defendants applied for a preliminary anti-suit injunction against the pending Greek action. The Greek action contains three classes of claims: one arising from the Greek consumer protection law; one arising from international conve ntions relating to international shipping, as ratified into Greek law; and one arising from Greek regulatory statutes concerning classification societies. The Court concludes that the China Trade test is satisfied with respect to the latter two claim s, and not satisfied with respect to the first. The Court also finds that Defendants have satisfied the traditional test for preliminary injunctions with respect to those two claims. Defendants' motion for a preliminary anti-suit injunction is GRANTED IN PART, as detailed above. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion pending at docket entry 20. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 9/23/2013) (rjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.