Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation As Receiver For Colonial Bank v. Chase Mortgage Finance Corp. et al
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation As Receiver For Colonial Bank |
| Chase Mortgage Finance Corp., JP Morgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC., Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc., Citimortgage, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., First Horizon Asset Securities Inc., First Horizon Home Loan Corporation, Ally Securities LLC., Credit Suisse (USA) LLC., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., FTN Financial Securities Corp., HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., RBS Securities Inc., UBS Securities LLC. and Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation |
| 1:2012cv06166 |
| August 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Louis L. Stanton |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
415
ORDER WITHDRAWING MARIA HEIFETZ AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR COLONIAL BANK: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Maria Heifetz be withdrawn as an attorney of record for Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Cor poration as Receiver for Colonial Bank. Plaintiff remains represented by David J. Grais of Grais & Ellsworth LLP and by Robert K. Spotswood and William Paulk of Spotswood Sansom & Sansbury LLC. IT IS SO ORDERED. Attorney Maria Heifetz terminated. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 5/31/2023) (tg)
|
|
Filing
413
ORDER WITHDRAWING VICKIE REZNIK AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR COLONIAL BANK: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Vickie Reznik be withdrawn as an attorney of record for Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corp oration as Receiver for Colonial Bank.Plaintiff remains represented by David J. Grais of Grais & Ellsworth LLP and by Robert K. Spotswood and William Paulk of Spotswood Sansom Sansbury LLC. Attorney Victoria Reznik terminated. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 5/23/2023) (rro)
|
|
Filing
410
OPINION AND ORDER re: 357 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment . filed by RBS Securities Inc., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC., 369 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment . filed by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation As Receiver For Colonial Bank. The defendant's motion for partial summary judgment is denied and plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment is granted. So ordered. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 3/3/2023) (tg)
|
|
Filing
409
OPINION & ORDER denying 357 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 369 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgement is granted, and defendants' cross motion for partial summaryjudgement is denied. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 2/3/2023) (ml)
|
|
Filing
319
OPINION & ORDER granting 293 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: RBS's motion for partial summary judgment (0kt. No. 293) dismissing claims against it with respect to the CMALT 2007-A3 and CMALT 2007-A5 certificates is granted. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 3/11/2020) (ml)
|
|
Filing
317
ORDER: Sufficient cause appearing, the March 15, 2019 fact discovery cutoff date set in paragraph 1 of the February 1, 2019 order (Dkt. No. 254) is vacated and the time for fact discovery is extended without date; every party may conduct further f actual discovery; any party may apply, on two weeks' notice, for the re-setting of a factual discovery cutoff date; and any party or non-party may apply in an appropriate court for relief from a discovery demand which is excessive, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome, and the imposition of costs of producing discovery upon the party seeking it. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 1/17/2020) (rro)
|
|
Filing
204
OPINION & ORDER: re: 196 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge Louis L. Stanton from James C. Rutten dated December 8, 2017, filed by Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, 187 JOINT MOTION to Dismiss Secon d Amended Complaint (Counts A-E,) filed by Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation. Defendants' motion partially to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 187) is granted in part and denied in part. The motion to dismiss the cl aims under the Nevada Uniform Securities Act and Section 12(a) (2) of the 1933 Act is granted. The motion to dismiss the Alabama Securities Act claims against the depositor defendants is granted. In all other respects, the motion is denied. The moti on for oral argument (Dkt. No. 196) is denied, and as further set forth in this order. Motions terminated: 187 JOINT MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Counts A-E), filed by Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, 196 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge Louis L. Stanton from James C. Rutten dated December 8, 2017, filed by Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 3/1/2018) (ap) Modified on 3/2/2018 (ml).
|
|
Filing
150
OPINION AND ORDER #104662. The FDIC Extender Statute does not alter applicable statutes of repose. Accordingly, the FDIC's claims are time-barred. Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings [Dkt No. 133] is granted. The clerk will ent er judgment for defendants, with costs and disbursements according to law. So ordered. re: 133 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings - Defendants' Notice of Motion Requesting Judgment on the Pleadings filed by RBS Securities Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 8/29/2014) (rjm). Modified on 9/2/2014 (ca).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
