Ace American Insurance Company et al v. GrafTech International Ltd. et al
| Insurance Company of North America, Pacific Employers Insurance Company, Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, Ace American Insurance Company and Ace Property & Casualty Insurance Company |
| GrafTech International Ltd., UCAR International, Inc. and UCAR Carbon Company, Inc. |
| 1:2012cv06355 |
| August 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons in this Opinion and Order, GrafTech's motion to dismiss is granted. ACE's motion for summary judgment is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close item numbers forty-one (41) and forty-two (42) on the docket and close the case. re: 42 MOTION to Dismiss filed by UCAR Carbon Company, Inc., UCAR International, Inc., GrafTech International Holdings Inc., GrafTech International Ltd., 41 MOTION for Summary Judgme nt Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, Insurance Company of North America, Century Indemnity Company, Ace Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Ace American Insurance Company. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 6/24/2014) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
