Peterson v. Apple Inc. et al

Peterson v. Apple Inc. et al

Plaintiff:	Andrea Peterson
Defendant:	Apple Inc.
Case Number:	1:2012cv06467
Filed:	August 23, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	George B. Daniels
Presiding Judge:	Gabriel W. Gorenstein
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 621
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 1, 2013	Filing 67 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER for 60 Motion to Dismiss filed by Apple Inc., 66 Report and Recommendations. Apple's motion to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2) and 41(b)(Docket #60) is granted. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 7/31/2013) (ja)
July 11, 2013	Filing 66 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 60 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Apple Inc. Plaintiff Andrea Peterson, proceeding pro se, brought this action pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law alleging that defendant Apple Inc. (Apple) refused to hire her on the basis of her age and negligently inflicted emotional distress. See Complaint, filed Aug. 23, 2012 (Docket # 1) (Compl .). Apple now moves to dismiss this action based on Peterson's failure to comply with Court orders and her failure to prosecute pursuant to Rules 37(b)(2) and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because Peterson has filed no oppositi on to the motion, and because the motion is meritorious for the reasons discussed below, Apples motion should be granted and the case should be dismissed with prejudice. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pr ocedure, the parties have fourteen (14) days including weekends and holidays from service of this Report and Recommendation to serve and file any objections. Such objections (and any responses to objections) shall be filed with the Clerk of the Cour t, with copies sent to the Hon. George B. Daniels, and to the undersigned, at 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. Any request for an extension of time to file objections must be directed to Judge Daniels. If a party fails to file timely objections, that party will not be permitted to raise any objections to this Report and Recommendation on appeal. Objections to R&R due by 7/29/2013 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 7/10/2013) (rsh).

Date Filed

Document Text

August 1, 2013

Filing 67 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER for 60 Motion to Dismiss filed by Apple Inc., 66 Report and Recommendations. Apple's motion to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2) and 41(b)(Docket #60) is granted. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 7/31/2013) (ja)

July 11, 2013

Filing 66 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 60 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Apple Inc. Plaintiff Andrea Peterson, proceeding pro se, brought this action pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law alleging that defendant Apple Inc. (Apple) refused to hire her on the basis of her age and negligently inflicted emotional distress. See Complaint, filed Aug. 23, 2012 (Docket # 1) (Compl .). Apple now moves to dismiss this action based on Peterson's failure to comply with Court orders and her failure to prosecute pursuant to Rules 37(b)(2) and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because Peterson has filed no oppositi on to the motion, and because the motion is meritorious for the reasons discussed below, Apples motion should be granted and the case should be dismissed with prejudice. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pr ocedure, the parties have fourteen (14) days including weekends and holidays from service of this Report and Recommendation to serve and file any objections. Such objections (and any responses to objections) shall be filed with the Clerk of the Cour t, with copies sent to the Hon. George B. Daniels, and to the undersigned, at 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. Any request for an extension of time to file objections must be directed to Judge Daniels. If a party fails to file timely objections, that party will not be permitted to raise any objections to this Report and Recommendation on appeal. Objections to R&R due by 7/29/2013 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 7/10/2013) (rsh).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson v. Apple Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea Peterson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Represented By:	Alex Ali Ayazi
Represented By:	Alex Ali Ayazi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?