Simpson v. The City of New York et al
Plaintiff: Reisha Simpson
Defendant: The City of New York, The New York City Police Department, Kenson Nelson and Allison Demick
Case Number: 1:2012cv06577
Filed: August 28, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Katherine B. Forrest
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 93 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: re: 81 FIRST MOTION in Limine filed by Kenson Nelson, The City of New York, The New York City Police Department. This case is scheduled for a jury trial commencing on October 19, 2015. Before the Court a re a number of motions in limine. The Court's rulings are set forth below. Accordingly, defendant's MIL # 10 is DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion No. 1 is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion No. 2 is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion No. 3 is DENIED; Pla intiff's Motion No. 4 is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion No. 5 is GRANTED as unopposed; Plaintiff's Motion No. 6 is HELD IN ABEYANCE; Defendant's Motion No. 1 is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion No. 2 is GRANTED. Defendant's Motio n No. 3 is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion No. 4 is DENIED.Defendant's Motion No. 5 is HELD IN ABEYANCE; Defendant's Motion No. 6 is DENIED; Defendant's Motion No. 7 is DENIED as moot; Defendant's Motion No. 8 is GRANTED as unop posed; Defendant's Motion No. 9 is DENIED. Defendant's Motion No. 10 is DENIED. A hearing on spoliation shall be held prior to trial. Counsel shall confer and communicate with Chambers regarding an appropriate time.The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the in limine motions at ECF Nos.81 and 83. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 10/09/2015) (ama)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simpson v. The City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reisha Simpson
Represented By: Steven H. Goldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of New York
Represented By: Joshua Joseph Lax
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The New York City Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenson Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allison Demick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?