Sun et al v. China 1221, Inc. et al
| Hengjin Sun, Xiaohua Lu, Qiang Ma, Zhongliang Qiu, Hui Song, Jun Wang, Lianhua Wen, Quan Yan, Youqi Yang, Genxiang Zhang, Junhai Zhang, Meide Zhang, Qiuying Zhang, Weiting Zhao, Liqiang Zhou and Yuhai Zhou |
| China 1221, Inc., John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 1:2012cv07135 |
| September 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Richard J. Sullivan |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
317
ORDER: Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs shall submit a letter by April 8, 2022, indicating whether they intend to litigate or withdraw the pending attorneys' fees motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' coun sel, Mr. Yan, shall indicate in that letter whether he intends to continue representing Plaintiffs in this Court. If Mr. Yan wishes not to continue representing Plaintiffs, then he must make a proper motion to be relieved, and Plaintiffs should inform the Court whether they intend to proceed pro se. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 3/28/2022) Sitting by Designation. (ate)
|
|
Filing
313
ORDER granting 312 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. The Defendants' request for an extension is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties shall file a joint letter by February 23, 2022, setting forth their proposed next steps in this matter. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 2/11/2022) Sitting by Designation. (ate)
|
|
Filing
301
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, as previously set forth in the Court's prior orders, defense counsel shall update the Court regarding the status of Defendant's bankruptcy by December 29, 2020, and every ninety days thereafter. Defense counsel is advised that failure to comply with another deadline in this case without explanation may result in the imposition of sanctions and a referral to the Court's Grievance Committee. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan, Sitting by Designation on 10/1/20) (yv)
|
|
Filing
299
ORDER. Defendant's counsel is admonished that it should be more diligent about complying with Court-ordered deadlines moving forward. Accordingly, Defendant's counsel shall submit the previously ordered update by no later than September 29, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 9/28/2020) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
245
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, the Court denies double recovery on Plaintiffs' FLSA and NYLL claims and awards liquidated damages and prejudgment interest as set forth above. Now that the Court has resolved all legal is sues related to the parties' damages proposals, the Court will issue a judgment in a separately docketed order awarding damages to Hengjin Sun in the amount of $104,052.60; Youqi Yang in the amount of $33,427.46; and Hui Song in the amount of $43,980.68, based on the calculations below: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall make any submissions regarding the Remaining Plaintiffs' eligibility to recover consistent with Section IV of this opinion by May 2, 2016. Should the Remaining Plaintiffs choose to submit any additional evidence in response, they must do so by June 1, 2016. The Court will then issue a final judgment with respect to the Remaining Plaintiffs thereafter. The Court also notes th at Plaintiffs indicate their intention to move for costs and attorneys' fees in the future by separate memorandum. (Doc. No. 231 at 24- 25.) The Court finds that briefing on the issue of attorneys' fees and costs would be premature until damages are awarded to the Remaining Plaintiffs. (As further set forth in this Opinion) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 4/19/2016) (kl)
|
|
Filing
138
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' motion-whether construed as a request for entry of a final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) or a request for an interlocutory appeal pursuant to § ; 1292(b)-is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' alternative request for a "stay" of the August Opinion "pending trial" is likewise DENIED. As previously ordered, the parties shall appear for trial on November 2 , 2015, and, in preparation for trial, the parties shall comply with the deadlines set forth in the Court's September 10, 2015 Order. (Doc. No. 133.) (As further set forth in this Opinion.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 9/17/2015) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
