Gym Door Repairs, Inc. et al v. New York City Department of Education et al
| Gym Door Repairs, Inc. and Safepath Systems LLC |
| New York City Department of Education, Dennis M. Walcott, New York City School Construction Authority, The Board of Trustees of the New York City School Construction Authority, The City of New York, John T. Shea, Volkert Braren, Chris Coyle, Chris D'Alimonte, Thomas Fanizzi and John Does 1-5 |
| 1:2012cv07387 |
| October 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Suffolk |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the rig ht to reopen the action within ninety days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within ninety days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same ninety-day period to be "so o rdered" by the Court. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 6/28/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing
179
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the rig ht to reopen the action within forty-five days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within forty-five days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may b e denied solely on that basis. Further, if theparties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same forty-five day period to be "so ordered" by the Court. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court isdirected to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 5/10/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing
162
ORDER: The parties shall appear before this Court on February 16, 2022 at 12:00 p.m. in Courtroom 11D for a conference at which this will set the schedule for Final Pre-Trial Submissions. This case is proceeding to trial. SO ORDERED., ( Status Conference set for 2/16/2022 at 12:00 PM in Courtroom 11D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge P. Kevin Castel.) (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 2/11/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER denying without prejudice 147 Letter Motion for Discovery: Application denied without prejudice. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/15/2020) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER: The Court has reviewed plaintiffs' letter of August 20, 2020, (Doc. 142), defendants' response of August 28, 2020, (Doc. 144), and plaintiffs' reply of September 2, 2020, (Doc. 145), and ORDERS as follows: (1) In response to pla intiffs' initial letter of August 20, the Court has already extended discovery in this action to September 30, 2020. (Order of August 21, 2020; Doc. 143). No further extension is warranted. (2) By September 24, 2020, defendants shall file an aff idavit from a person or persons with knowledge and access to emails within defendants' custody or control stating that a diligent search has been made for the following and that none of the following have been located: (a) the emails described i n the second and third paragraphs on page 3 of plaintiffs' August 20, 2020 letter, (Doc. 142); and (b) the email described in the last paragraph on the first page of plaintiffs' letter of September 2, 2020, (Doc. 145). (3) Defendants shall produce attorney Owen Conroy for a two-hour deposition limited to the issue of the manner in which the two Manhattan schools were selected for inspection. (4) All other relief sought by either party is either moot or denied. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/10/2020) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER terminating 142 Letter Motion for Discovery: The faux outrage from parties who did little to move this case from August 2018 to May 2019 is a bit much. I will extend discovery one last time to September 30, 2020. Counsel for defendants shall respond to the substance of the claims that they have failed to produce documents in discovery within seven days. The existing conference date remains as scheduled. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 8/21/2020) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, conferences with the Court in civil cases will be held by teleconferencing until further notice. Counsel for the plaintiff(s) shall arrange for the conference call. Each scheduled conference will take place o n the date and time originally set. The conference in this case is scheduled for June 30, 2020 at 12:00 p.m. At the conference, the Court will only entertain discovery disputes that have been fully settled between the parties and described in deta il in a letter to the Court. No later than seventy-two hours before the conference, plaintiff(s)' counsel shall: (a) docket a letter on ECF to the Court with copy to all opposing counsel containing the call-in information and email the letter to castelnysdchambers@nysd.uscourts.gov ; and (b) for an initial pretrial conference, email a copy of the agreed upon (or disputed) Civil Case Management Plan & Scheduling Order to: castelnysdchambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 6/10/2020) ( Telephone Conference set for 6/30/2020 at 12:00 PM before Judge P. Kevin Castel.) (ks)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER granting 131 Letter Motion for Discovery. Fact discovery is extended to June 12, 2020. May 18 conference adjourned to June 30, 2020 at 12:00 p.m. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 4/22/2020) (mro)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER granting 121 Letter Motion for Discovery: The defendants are ordered to produce all non-privileged non-work product responsive documents and produce a privilege log for all withheld documents by Janaury 17, 2020. The plaintiffs may continue to conduct discovery until February 17, 2020. The Janary 13 conference is adjourned until March 17, 2020 at 11:30 a.m. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 12/13/2019) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
70
OPINION re: 61 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. filed by Thomas Fanizzi, John T. Shea, The Board of Trustees of the New York City School Construction Authority, New York City Department of Education, Volkert Braren, The Cit y of New York, Chris Coyle, John Does 1-5, Dennis M. Walcott, Chris D'Alimonte, New York City School Construction Authority. Upon the conclusions set forth above, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs' First Amendment Claim survives, and NYCSCA remains a defendant. Defendants' other requests for dismissal are granted. It is so ordered. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 6/22/2015) (ajs)
|
|
Filing
56
OPINION re: 49 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Thomas Fanizzi, John T. Shea, The Board of Trustees of the New York City School Construction Authority, New York City Department of Education, Volkert Braren, The C ity of New York, Chris Coyle, John Does 1-5, Dennis M. Walcott, Chris D'Alimonte, New York City School Construction Authority. Upon the conclusions set forth above, Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and the Complaint is dismissed with leave given to replead within twenty-one days. It is so ordered. (See Order.) (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 11/3/2014) (ajs)
|
|
Filing
35
OPINION: Upon the conclusions set forth above, Plaintiffs' request for injunctive relief is denied, and Defendants' motion (23) to dismiss the Complaint is granted with leave given to replead within twenty days. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 9/5/2013) (cd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
