Winkfield v. Kirschenbaum & Philliips, P.C.
Plaintiff: Shynisha Winkfield
Defendant: Kirschenbaum & Philliips, P.C.
Case Number: 1:2012cv07424
Filed: October 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Nassau
Presiding Judge: Jesse M. Furman
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 8 MOTION for Sergei Lemberg, Vlad Hirnyk to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Shynisha Winkfield. For the reasons set forth above, Lemberg's motion to withdraw and assert a lien on the file is GRANTED, subject to t he modifications mentioned above. (Docket No.8). No later than February 6, 2013, Lemberg shall submit to the Orders and Judgments Clerk of the Court, and copy Plaintiff, a proposed judgment consistent with this Order, and shall also submit to the Co urt any documentary material with which it wishes to support its request for costs. Plaintiff shall have three (3) weeks from the date of this Order to obtain substitute counsel; Plaintiff's substitute counsel shall register as a filing user on ECF promptly upon being retained. If Plaintiff does not retail substitute counsel, the Court will deem Plaintiff as a pro se litigant. If Plaintiff chooses to represent herself pro se (without an attorney), she is directed to contact the Pro Se Offic e for this district at 500 Pearl Street, Room 230, New York, New York 10007, telephone number (212) 805-0175, for any procedural assistance she may require in litigating this case. Further, in light of the circumstances, the initial pretrial conferen ce scheduled for January 31, 2013, is rescheduled for March 7, 2013, at 4:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1105 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007. All pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. Any party that is proceeding in this case pro se is required to appear personally at this conference. The parties shall submit a revised proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, using the form on the Court's website, and a joint status letter by the Thursday prior to the conference. Finally, Lemberg is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff and shall file proof of such service with the Court. Lemberg is also directed to promptly notify Pla intiff of the adjournment of the initial pretrial conference., ( Initial Conference set for 3/7/2013 at 04:15 PM in Courtroom 1105, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Jesse M. Furman.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/29/2013) (lmb) Modified on 1/29/2013 (lmb).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Winkfield v. Kirschenbaum & Philliips, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shynisha Winkfield
Represented By: Sergei Lemberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kirschenbaum & Philliips, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?