New Amsterdam Capital Partners, LLC v. Krasovsky

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District New Amsterdam Capital Partners, LLC v. Krasovsky

New Amsterdam Capital Partners, LLC v. Krasovsky

Plaintiff:	New Amsterdam Capital Partners, LLC
Defendant:	Gregory Krasovsky
Case Number:	1:2012cv07621
Filed:	October 9, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Victor Marrero
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 10, 2017	Filing 52 ORDER: Accordingly, I have reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error and find none. I therefore adopt the well-reasoned and thorough Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Finally, Defendant's motion "to dispose of his Mot ion to Set Aside Default, filed per Rule 60(b)," (Doc. 49), is denied as moot because the motion referencedDefendant's March 5, 2014 "Motion to Vacate or Set Aside Default Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 55(c) and/or 60(b)," (Docs. 29, 30)was considered and denied for the reasons stated in my March 10, 2014 Text Order, (Doc. 37). To the extent Defendant's motion can be construed as a new motion pursuant to Rules 55(c) and 60(b), it is denied for the same reasons, namely that any motion to set aside the default is untimely because it has already been affirmed on appeal by the Second Circuitno motion to set aside the mandate having been madeand because Defendant has failed to establish good cause to set aside the default judgment or any other basis for relief. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment and terminate this action. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 1/10/2017) (cla)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 10, 2017

Filing 52 ORDER: Accordingly, I have reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error and find none. I therefore adopt the well-reasoned and thorough Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Finally, Defendant's motion "to dispose of his Mot ion to Set Aside Default, filed per Rule 60(b)," (Doc. 49), is denied as moot because the motion referencedDefendant's March 5, 2014 "Motion to Vacate or Set Aside Default Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 55(c) and/or 60(b)," (Docs. 29, 30)was considered and denied for the reasons stated in my March 10, 2014 Text Order, (Doc. 37). To the extent Defendant's motion can be construed as a new motion pursuant to Rules 55(c) and 60(b), it is denied for the same reasons, namely that any motion to set aside the default is untimely because it has already been affirmed on appeal by the Second Circuitno motion to set aside the mandate having been madeand because Defendant has failed to establish good cause to set aside the default judgment or any other basis for relief. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment and terminate this action. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 1/10/2017) (cla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: New Amsterdam Capital Partners, LLC v. Krasovsky
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: New Amsterdam Capital Partners, LLC
Represented By:	Eileen Theresa Rohan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory Krasovsky
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?