Hernandez v. NGM Management Group LLC et al
| Gabino Hernandez |
| George Hadjipanayi, Michael Pitsinos, NGM Management Group LLC and Nikos Karaiskos |
| 1:2012cv07795 |
| October 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
OPINION: Here Plaintiff has not submitted the name of one employee to substantiate his contentions. He admitted in his deposition that he did not speak with any employees at Defendants' facility either during or after his employment. Plaintiff h as not elaborated on how the 20% calculation of hours in his workdays that were spent on non-tipped duties was determined or how many employees he saw suffered from the same scheme or plan. Plaintiff has failed to make the sufficient factual showing to justify conditional collective certification. Because the Plaintiff has not shown the requisite proof to warrant certification his motion at this time. So Ordered (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 10/17/2013) (js)
|
|
Filing
28
OPINION re: 12 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Gabino Hernandez. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion is granted. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 9/18/2013) (cd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
