Porzio v. Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. et al
| Robert Porzio |
| Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc., Morten Arntzen and Myles R. Itkin |
| 1:2012cv07948 |
| October 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Shira A. Scheindlin |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
155
OPINION AND ORDER re: 125 MOTION to Dismiss NOTICE OF MORTEN ARNTZEN AND MYLES R. ITKINS MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Morten Arntzen. For the foregoing reasons, Arntzen and Itkin's motion t o dismiss is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this motion (Dkt. No. 125). A conference is scheduled for May 22, 2014 at 4:30 pm., ( Status Conference set for 5/22/2014 at 04:30 PM before Judge Shira A. Scheindlin.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/28/2014) (lmb)
|
|
Filing
137
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Therefore, plaintiffs' request to amend is granted. Plaintiffs may amend their complaint to add factual allegations from the Proskauer lawsuit by February 14, 2014. Arntzen and Itkin may submit a supplemental memorandum of law on their pending motion to dismiss, limited to five (5) double-spaced pages, by February 21, 2014. Plaintiffs may submit a response of the same length by February 28, 2014. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 2/7/2014) (cd)
|
|
Filing
113
OPINION AND ORDER re: 102 MOTION to Dismiss of Ernst & Young LLP, filed by Ernst & Young, 95 MOTION to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, filed by PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP, 85 MOTION to Dismiss NOTICE OF THE INDIVID UAL DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed by Morten Arntzen, 86 MOTION to Dismiss /Notice of Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint, filed by Goldman, Sachs & Co., ING Financial Markets, LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (f/k/a Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated), Citigroup Global Markets Inc., DNB Markets, Inc. (f/k/a DnB NOR Markets, Inc.). For the foregoing reasons, the motions to dismiss by E&Y, PwC, and the Underwriter Defendants are denied in full. The Individual Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted with respect to the Exchange Act claims and denied with respect to the Securities Act Claims. It is further Ordered that Plaintiffs are granted leave to replead within thirty days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to close these motions (Docket Nos. 85, 86, 95, 102). (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 9/10/2013) (ja)
|
|
Filing
64
OPINION AND ORDER: The OSG Securities Actions and any action arising out of the same operative facts and alleging causes of action under the PSLRA hereafter filed are consolidated for pre-trial and trial purposes under the caption In re OSG Securitie s Litigation, Master File Number 12 Civ. 7948. The DSM Group is appointed Lead Plaintiff in the OSG Securities Actions. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is appointed Lead Counsel. A conference is scheduled for February 12, 2013 at 4:30 p.m. in courtroom 15C. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close these motions (documents no. 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 43, and 47 in 12 Civ. 7948; and documents no. 11, 14, and 17 in 12 Civ. 8547). (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 2/1/2013) (ft)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
