Midamines SPRL Ltd. et al v. KBC Bank NV et al
| Midamines SPRL Ltd. and Hassan A. Abbas |
| KBC Bank NV and Antwerp Diamantse Bank NV |
| 1:2012cv08089 |
| November 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Richard J. Sullivan |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
OPINION AND ORDER re: 81 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument and Adversarial Hearing Relative to the Defendants' Motion for Fees and Motion For Defendants to Produce the Unredacted Version of the Bills/Retainer Agreement to Plaintiffs And Objections filed by Midamines SPRL Ltd., 70 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by KBC Bank NV. For the reasons stated above, the Court concludes that Defendant's request for $75,000 in fees and $722.50 in co sts is reasonable. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs shall pay Defendant $75,722.50 for attorneys' fees and costs related to the motion to disqualify and the motion to seal filed with the Second Circuit. IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED THAT Defendant's request for a bond pending Plaintiff's compliance with the fee award is denied as unnecessary. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions located at docket numbers 70 and 81, and to close this case. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 3/16/2016) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
