Triumph Construction, Corp. v. The New York City District Council Carpenters Pension Fund et al
| Michael Bilello and Roger E. Maher |
| Triumph Construction, Corp. |
| The New York City District Council Carpenters Pension Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Apprenticeship , Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Charity Fund and The New York City and Vicinity Carpenters Labor-Management Corporation |
| 1:2012cv08297 |
| November 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| P. Kevin Castel |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
OPINION AND ORDER re: 51 FIRST MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by New York City District Council of Carpenters Charity Fund, The New York City and Vicinity Carpenters Labor-Management Corporation, New York City District Counc il of Carpenters Welfare Fund, The New York City District Council Carpenters Pension Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, New York City District Council of C arpenters Annuity Fund: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS in part Respondents' request for attorneys' fees. From the requested fees figure of $62,615.00, the Court deducts $1,525.00 for time billed in relation to the t wo settlement conferences and $2,000.00 for time billed in connection with the instant application for the attorneys' fees. From the new total of $59,090.00, the Court imposes an across-the-board reduction of 15% ($8,863. 50) for Respondents' duplicate entries and instances of "block billing." Adding in $1,458.33 for allowable costs, Respondents are entitled to attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $51,684.83. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close this case. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/8/2014) (tn)
|
|
Filing
50
OPINION AND ORDER re: 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Triumph Construction, Corp., 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs filed by New York City District Council of Carpenters Charity F und, The New York City and Vicinity Carpenters Labor-Management Corporation, New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, The New York City District Council Carpenters Pension Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund: For the reasons set forth above, Respondents' motion is GRANTED and Petitioner's motion is DENIE D. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at docket entries 19 and 28. It is further ORDERED that, by no later than July 30, 2014, Respondents shall submit a fee application to the Court, including a sworn declaration providing each attorney's background, experience, and billing rate at the time the work was expended, as well as copies of the attorneys' time sheets. Petitioner may submit papers opposing the amount of fees requested, but not the imposition of fees themselves, by no later than August 27, 2014. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 7/3/2014) (tn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
