Andrews v. Sotheby International Realty, Inc. et al
| Clayton Andrews |
| Sotheby International Realty, Inc. and Huntsman Financial Consulting, L.C. |
| 1:2012cv08824 |
| December 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Huntsman Financial Consulting, L.C., 24 MOTION to Dismiss (Notice of) filed by Sotheby International Realty, Inc.: Accordingly, Defendant SIR's motion to dismiss is granted in full. Defendant Huntsman's motion is granted as to Counts IV, VI, VII, and VIII and denied as to Counts II, III, and V. The remaining parties are to appear for a conference on February 28, 2014 at 4:00 p.m. in Courtroom 1506 at the Thurgood Marshall U nited States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007. Plaintiff's counsel and Defendant Huntsman's Utah counsel may appear telephonically.The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close item numbers twenty (20) and twenty-four (24) on the docket and close the case against Defendant Sotheby's International Realty, Inc. Sotheby International Realty, Inc. terminated. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 2/18/2014) (tn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
