Rosado v. Mental Health Personnell of Rikers Island Daphnee Herard et al
Tyrone Rosado |
Mental Health Personnell of Rikers Island Daphnee Herard, Mental Health Clenician Dorell Hyde and Mental Health Unit Chief Harris |
1:2012cv08943 |
December 7, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Queens |
Paul G. Gardephe |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 30 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Mental Health Personnell of Rikers Island Daphnee Herard. For the reasons stated above, Defendant's motion to dismiss is denied with respect to Plaintiff's equ al protection and First Amendment retaliation claims, except to the extent that compensatory damages for mental and emotional injury are sought in connection with these claims. The motion to dismiss is granted with respect to these claims to the exte nt that they seek compensatory damages for mental and emotional injury. The motion is also granted with respect to Plaintiff's remaining federal claims. The motion to dismiss is otherwise denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion (Dkt. No. 30) and to mail a copy of this Order to Tyrone Rosado, 241-11-05751, Anna M. Kross Center (A.M.K.C.) C-95, 18-18 Hazen Street, East Elmhurst, New York 11370. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 3/25/2014) (mro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.