Hidalgo v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Carlos Manuel Hidalgo |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2012cv09009 |
| December 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Sarah Netburn |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: for 44 Report and Recommendations. 36 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Carlos Manuel Hidalgo. The Court has reviewed carefully Magistrate Judge Netburn's Report andRecommendation and finds no clear error. The Court therefore adopts the Report in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, the motion for attorneys' fees is granted, in the amount of $14,943.25, and Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to refund directly to Plaintiff the previously awarded EAJA fees of $9,000. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate docket entry number 36. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 4/10/2017) (ap)
|
|
Filing
32
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. For the foregoing reasons, the Report is hereby adopted in its entirety. This case is remanded to the Social Security Administration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § ; 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with the Report and this Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment and close this case. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves docket entries numbers 17, 19 and 30. SO ORDERED. Re: 30 MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Carlos Manuel Hidalgo. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/24/2014) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. For the foregoing reasons, the Report is hereby adopted in its entirety. This case is remanded to the Social Security Administration pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with the Report and this Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to effectuate the remand, and to close this case in the District Court subject to reopening upon the completion of proceedings on remand. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves docket entries numbers 17 and 19. re: 17 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Commissioner of Social Security, 19 MOTION filed by Carlos Manuel Hidalgo. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 6/25/2014) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hidalgo v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carlos Manuel Hidalgo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
