Saunders et al v. Bank of America et al
| Deborah A. Saunders, Connie P. Mele, Jeannie McBride, Lorraine Hunter, Wanda Beliz, Gaye Idrissa, Gladys Garcia, Cynthia Collier, Michelle Garrett and Richard Garrett |
| Bank of America, Citi Mortgage, JPMorgan Chase N.A., Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Ally Financial/GMAC, Deutsche Bank Trust Company and US Bank National N.A. Trustee |
| 1:2012cv09201 |
| December 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Unassigned |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
341
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER for 335 Report and Recommendations, 327 Motion to Dismiss filed by WRI Capital Group LLC, 71 Motion to Dismiss filed by Deutsche Bank Trust Company, 311 Report and Recommendations, 166 Motion to Dism iss filed by Bank of America, US Bank National N.A. Trustee, JPMorgan Chase N.A., Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Citi Mortgage. Magistrate Judge Ellis's recommendation to dismiss the Amended Complaint is adopted. Defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED. The instant action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motions at ECF Nos. 71, 166, and 327, and this case. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 9/22/2014) (ajs)
|
|
Filing
331
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER adopting 311 Report and Recommendations. Upon de novo review, this Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Ellis's Report and his recommendations as set forth herein. Plaintiffs' requests for entry of default judgmen t against Defendants Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, Citi Mortgage, JP Morgan Chase Bank, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank National N.A., Ally Financial, and non-parties Moynihan, Merscorp, and Bank of New York Mellon are DENIED. Plaintiffs' claims agains t Defendant Ally Financial are DISMISSED for failure to serve. All issues and requests relating to Defendant WRI are RECOMMITTED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Prior to submitting any future documents in this case, Plaintiffs are re quired to send any proposed filings or submissions to the Pro Se Office, which shall determine whether each submission is appropriate for filing, and make a recommendation to this Court as to whether it should be accepted or rejected. If it is determined that a submission is inappropriate for filing, it shall be returned to the sender. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 4/25/2014) (mro)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION re: 32 MOTION to Amend/Correct 14 Amended Complaint, filed by Cynthia Nunez-Collier, Deborah A. Saunders, 27 MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Lorraine Hunter, Roy Daniels, Janette Bowen, Richard Garrett, Gladys Garc ia, Gaye Idrissa, Wanda Beliz, Cynthia Nunez-Collier, Michelle Garrett, Dorcas Payne, Michael Loncke, Jeannie McBride, Connie P. Mele, Shirnel Grant, Sebastian Sherrod, Deborah A. Saunders, 30 MOTION request to reissue service because the post offi ce box was wrong filed by Deborah A. Saunders: Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs' motions are DENIED. Plaintiffs are directed to serve the Amended Complaint on Defendants by December 18, 2013. Failure to serve by that date may result in the case being dismissed for failure to prosecute. This Memorandum Opinion & Order resolves Docket Numbers 27, 30, and 32. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 11/15/2013) (tn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
