Patel et al v. Jani
| Nitin Patel and Deepak Patel |
| Bijal Jani |
| 7:2012cv09376 |
| December 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Kenneth M. Karas |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, the Court finds that plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden of proof as to each of the claims. Accordingly, judgment is entered for the defendant. Each party shall bear its own costs. This Opinion & Order constitutes the judgment of the Court and terminates the action. (As further set forth in this order) (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 6/30/2016) (lmb)
|
|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 68 MOTION in Limine to Admit Statements by the Jani family as co-conspirators under Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E) and as verbal acts filed by Deepak Patel, Nitin Patel, 63 MOTION in Limine filed by Bijal Jani. Defendant's Motion in Limine (ECF No. 63) is DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine (ECF No. 68) is GRANTED with the important caveat set forth above. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 63 and 68. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 9/18/2015) (kko)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
