Clarke v. United States of America
||United States of America
||January 7, 2013
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||Henry B. Pitman
||Loretta A. Preska
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 4, 2019
MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 17 Report and Recommendations. Clarke's objections to the Report and Recommendation are denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 2/4/19) (yv)
|May 15, 2017
ORDER adopting 17 Report and Recommendation: The Court has carefully reviewed the thorough and well-reasoned R&R and finds that there is no clear error of law. Accordingly, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. The petition for a writ of habea s corpus is denied and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal right, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Fu rthermore, Petitioner has waived his right to appeal because he has not filed any objections to the R&R. (R&R at 12). The Clerk's Office is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Petitioner at his last known address: Maurice Clarke, 53988-054, Federal Correction Complex (Med), Post Office Box 5000, Yazoo City, MS 39194-5888. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 5/15/2017) (jwh)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?