Villafana v. So et al
Plaintiff: |
Juan A. Villafana |
Defendant: |
Paul So and URS Midwest Inc. |
Case Number: |
1:2013cv00180 |
Filed: |
January 8, 2013 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Office: |
Foley Square Office |
County: |
New York |
Presiding Judge: |
Katherine B. Forrest |
Nature of Suit: |
Motor Vehicle |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
May 29, 2013 |
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: This negligence action was commenced in the New York State Supreme Court, New York County; thereafter, it was removed to this court by the defendants, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1441. In their notice of removal, the defendants mainta in that the action is removable based on diversity of citizenship conferred by 28 U.S.C.A. Section 1332. According to the defendants, complete diversity exists among the parties because [t]he plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the State of New Yo rk... Defendant Paul SO is a citizen and resident of the State of Maryland... Defendant URS Midwest Inc. is a corporation[,] which is incorporated in Delaware[,] with a principal place of business in Michigan. In addition, the defendants contend that , [a]ccording to the Verified Complaint, plaintiffs alleged injuries are serious in nature and exceed the jurisdictional limits of all lower New York State courts. Upon information and belief, the amount in controversy in this action exceeds the 6;75,000 required for Federal District Court Jurisdiction. The plaintiffs verified complaint does not identify the amount in controversy. Based on the record before it, and mindful that "federal courts construe the removal statute narrowly, res olving any doubts against removability[,]" Lupo, 28 F.3d at 274, the Court finds that the defendants have not satisfied their burden of establishing that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000; therefore, this matter was removed improperly from state court. Accordingly, this action is remanded to the state court from which it was removed, the New York State Supreme Court, New York County. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 5/29/2013) (rsh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?