Obaid v. Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund et al
Abdo Obaid |
Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund and Board of Trustees of Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund |
1:2013cv00241 |
January 10, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
John G. Koeltl |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The plaintiff is entitled to a judgment equal to the disability pension benefits withheld from the date of entitlement to the date of judgment, minus all long term disability benefits and early retirement pension benefit s actually paid to Obaid. The plaintiff is also entitled to disability pension benefits going forward. However, neither party has briefed (a) the precise dollar amount of disability benefits that was improperly withheld from Obaid, (b) whether Obaid is entitled to attorneys fees and costs, (c) the proper amount, if any, of the fees and costs, (d) whether Obaid is entitled to pre-judgment interest, and (e) the applicable pre-judgment interest rate. Therefore, this opinion concerns only the defend ants' liability. Obaid may move, with supporting evidence, for the Court to determine the dollar amount of disability benefits that were improperly withheld from Obaid and to award pre-judgment interest, attorneys fees, and costs. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/1/2014) (rjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.