Granados et al v. Traffic Bar And Restaurant,INC., et al
| Ninoska Granados, Kristina Griggs, Julia Main, Jessica Nienhaus and Heather Soukas |
| Traffic Bar And Restaurant,INC., Christopher Foley, Joey Morgan, Michael O'Niel, Meagan Pugh and Paul Valenti |
| 1:2013cv00500 |
| January 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| Thomas P. Griesa |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
ORDER for 110 Report and Recommendations: The court adopts Magistrate Judge Francis's Report and Recommendation in full. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in the amount of $34,622.07, plus pre-judgment interest, to be calculated as set forth in the Report and Recommendation. Attorneys' fees and costs of $73,281.97 are also awarded. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 3/29/2017) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
110
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. I recommend that judgment be entered against the defendants Traffic Bar and Restaurant, Inc., Christopher Foley, and Paul Valenti, jointly and severally, as follows: 1. Ms. Granados should be awarded $5,767.96 in actua l damages, which will accrue interest at a rate of $1.36 per day from September 14, 2011, until the date judgment is entered; $5,561.33 in liquidated damages under the NYLL; and $261.00 in liquidated damages under the FLSA. 2. Ms. Grig gs should be awarded $1,566.00 in actual damages, which will accrue interest at a rate of $0.39 per day from February 16, 2012, until the date judgment is entered; and $1,566.00 in liquidated damages under the NYLL. 3. Ms. Main should be awarded actual damages in the amount of $2,469.50, which will accrue interest at a rate of $0.61 per day from November 28, 2011, until the date judgment is entered; and $2,469.50 in liquidated damages under the NYLL. 4. Ms. Nienhaus should be awarded actual damages in the amount of $3,245.74, which will accrue interest at a rate of $0.80 per day from July 14, 2011, until the date judgment is entered; and $3,245.74 in liquidated damages under the NYLL. 5. Ms. Souk as should be awarded $4,234.65 in actual damages, which will accrue interest at a rate of $1.04 per day from January 23, 2012, until the date judgment is entered; and $4,234.65 in liquidated damages under the NYLL. In addition, I recommend an award of attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $73,281.97. (Objections to R&R due by 1/4/2017) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 12/21/2016) Copies transmitted this date. (rjm)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 68 Motion for Sanctions; granting in part and denying in part 68 Letter Motion to Compel. For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiffs' motion to compel and for sanctions (Docket no. 68) is granted in part. Regarding the motion to compel, the defendants shall comply with the discovery order contained herein or risk further sanctions, including, possibly, terminating sanctions. As for the motion for Rule 37 sanctions, the motion is granted with respect to monetary sanctions for the defendants' failure to appear for their depositions, but denied in all other respects. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 12/30/2015) Copies Sent By Chambers. (cdo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
