BPP Illinois, LLC et al v. The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC et al
| BPP Illinois, LLC, BPP Iowa, LLC, BPP Michigan, LLC, BPP Minnesota, LLC, BPP Texas, LLC, FFC Partnership, L.P. and Fine Capital Associates, L.P. |
| The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, RBS Citizens, N.A. and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania |
| 1:2013cv00638 |
| January 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Jesse M. Furman |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
OPINION AND ORDER re: 61 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Budget Portfolio Properties, LLC, FFC Partnership, L.P., BPP Iowa, LLC, BPP Minnesota, LLC, BPP Michigan, LLC, Fine Capital Associate s, L.P., BPP Texas, LLC, BPP Illinois, LLC, BPP Wisconsin, LLC, 55 MOTION to Transfer Case filed by Budget Portfolio Properties, LLC, FFC Partnership, L.P., BPP Iowa, LLC, BPP Minnesota, LLC, BPP Michigan, LLC, Fin e Capital Associates, L.P., BPP Texas, LLC, BPP Illinois, LLC, BPP Wisconsin, LLC: For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend and restore the claims of the FFC Plaintiffs and the Equity Plaintiff is DENIED. Defen dants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED insofar as the Court holds that the BPP Plaintiffs may not pursue their claims for lack of standing or based on judicial estoppel. But instead of dismissing the case outright, the Court stays the case to g ive an appropriate party the opportunity to move in the Bankruptcy Court to reopen the bankruptcy case and then pursue the claims against Defendants here. The Court sees no reason to keep the case open while the case is stayed. Accordingly, the Cl erk of Court is directed to administratively close the case without prejudice to the right of an appropriate party to reopen the case within six months of the date of this Opinion and Order in the event that there is a party with standing to pursue the claims against Defendants. In addition, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Nos. 55 and 61. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/19/2015) (tn)
|
|
Filing
44
OPINION AND ORDER re: 21 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. filed by Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, RBS Citizens, N.A., The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 28 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. filed by Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, RBS Citizens, N.A., The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Defendants' previously filed motion to dismiss the initial Complaint is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Nos. 21 and 28 and to close the case. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/13/2013) (djc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
