Hardimon v. Westechester County et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 16, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. For the reasons stated herein, the motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute (Docket No. 25) is granted. The Clerk shall enter judgment for the defendant. Counsel for the defendant is directed to supply plaintiff with copies of all unreported decisions cited herein. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied. See Coppedge v. UnitedStates, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 5/16/2014) Copies Mailed to Plaintiff By Chambers. (ama)
|November 6, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 17 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons stated above, defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. 17) is GRANTED as to all claims brought against defendant Westchester County, the state law assault claim against all defenda nts, and the claim of denial of access to the courts against all defendants and DENIED regarding all other claims. Defendants' counsel is ordered to mail to the plaintiff copies of all unpublished authorities cited herein. The Court certifies pu rsuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED.(Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 11/06/2013) (ama)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?