Cummings et al v. The City of New York et al
Cynthia Cummings, Raglan George, Jr., Betty Powell, Carolyn Cox, Luz Santiago, Gina Rusch, Andre Lake and Cynthia McCright |
The City of New York and New York City Administration for Children's Services |
1:2013cv01303 |
February 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Ronnie Abrams |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 117 OPINION & ORDER re: 69 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by The City of New York, New York City Administration for Children's Services. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants, the City of New York and the New York City Administration f or Children's Services ("ACS"), failed to make approximately $15 million in contributions to the Fund between 2009 and 2012. They assert a claim under Section 515 of ERISA as well as various state law claims. Defendants, who n ow move for summary judgment, argue that they were not obligated to make the contributions at issue. Because the Court agrees with Defendants that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all claims, Defendants' motion is granted. Def endants' motion for summary judgment is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Docket Number 69 and enter judgment in favor of Defendants, and as further set forth herein. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/29/2017) (ras) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.