Siegel et al v. Bloomberg L.P.

Siegel et al v. Bloomberg L.P.

Plaintiff:	Lee Siegel
Defendant:	Bloomberg L.P.
Case Number:	1:2013cv01351
Filed:	February 28, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Denise L. Cote
Nature of Suit:	Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 16, 2015	Filing 100 OPINION AND ORDER....Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted in part. Plaintiffs are entitled to a summary determination that they were covered by and not exempt from the overtime provisions of the FLSA. Plaintiffs are not entitled to summary acceptance of their calculation of working hours. Nor are they entitled to summary judgment on the issue of what pay rate should apply to overtime hours. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 1/16/2015) (gr)
August 16, 2013	Filing 26 OPINION & ORDER re: 15 MOTION to Certify Class. filed by Lee Siegel.Plaintiff's May 20, 2013 request for Rule 23 class certification is denied. Plaintiff's request to distribute FLSA collective action notice is granted. Pursuant to plain tiffs request, Bloomberg is ordered to produce the following contact information for all current and former Bloomberg SDRs employed since March 2010 in computer-readable form: names, addresses, and e-mail addresses. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 8/16/2013) (djc)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 16, 2015

Filing 100 OPINION AND ORDER....Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted in part. Plaintiffs are entitled to a summary determination that they were covered by and not exempt from the overtime provisions of the FLSA. Plaintiffs are not entitled to summary acceptance of their calculation of working hours. Nor are they entitled to summary judgment on the issue of what pay rate should apply to overtime hours. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 1/16/2015) (gr)

August 16, 2013

Filing 26 OPINION & ORDER re: 15 MOTION to Certify Class. filed by Lee Siegel.Plaintiff's May 20, 2013 request for Rule 23 class certification is denied. Plaintiff's request to distribute FLSA collective action notice is granted. Pursuant to plain tiffs request, Bloomberg is ordered to produce the following contact information for all current and former Bloomberg SDRs employed since March 2010 in computer-readable form: names, addresses, and e-mail addresses. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 8/16/2013) (djc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Siegel et al v. Bloomberg L.P.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lee Siegel
Represented By:	Dan Charles Getman
Represented By:	Dan Charles Getman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bloomberg L.P.
Represented By:	Thomas H Golden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?