Costello et al v. Kohl's Illinois,Inc., et al
Amanda Costello and Loniece Reed |
Kohl's Corporation,, Kohl's Department Stores,Inc., and Kohl's Illinois,Inc., |
1:2013cv01359 |
February 28, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Orange |
Paul G. Gardephe |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 42 FIRST MOTION to Certify Class . filed by Amanda Costello. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion to conditionally certify an FLSA collective action is granted. Kohl's is ordered t o disclose the aforementioned information about its employees by September 25, 2014. The parties shall confer on the form and dissemination of notice by September 12, 2014 and submit the notice as described above by September 19, 2014. The parties shall also submit a proposed scheduling order for the remainder of discovery and all anticipated motions no later than September 19, 2014. A status conference will be held on September 23, 2014 at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 9A of the United States Di strict Court for the Southern District of New York, Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse at 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, 10007. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the pending motion at Dkt. No. 42. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/4/2014) (kgo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.