Medinol, Ltd. v. Cordis Corporation et al
| Medinol, Ltd. |
| Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson |
| 1:2013cv01408 |
| March 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Shira A. Scheindlin |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Civil Action to Obtain Patent |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: In light of the Opinion & Mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, ECF Nos. 112-14, this case is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/4/2020) (jca)
|
|
Filing
106
OPINION AND ORDER re: 95 MOTION to Vacate 65 Clerk's Judgment, . filed by Medinol, Ltd. After careful consideration, the circumstances in this case are not sufficiently extraordinary to cause this Court relieve Plaintiff from final judgment. This case presents a change in decisional law, and nothing more. Therefore, Plaintiff's Rule 60(b)(6) Motion to Vacate Judgment is hereby DENIED. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 3/29/2019) (cf)
|
|
Filing
64
OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, I find that laches presents an entire defense to Medinol's infringement claims. Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/14/2014) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
