Rouse v. Elliot Stevens, Ltd. et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 3, 2016
OPINION AND ORDER: Because Rouse has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that the defendants acted with the required scienter to support a fraud claim, the Court grants defendants judgment on Rouse's fraud claim. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and close this case. (As further set forth in the Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 11/3/2016) (mro)
|June 24, 2016
OPINION & ORDER re: 71 CROSS MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Elliot Stevens, Ltd., Steven Shalom, 74 FIRST MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Christopher Rouse. The defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to the plaintiff's breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims is GRANTED. Both parties' motions for judgment on the pleadings with respect to the plaintiff's fraud claims are DENIED. The parties shall a ppear at the Final Pre-Trial Conference on June 30, 2016, at 10:00 in Courtroom 219 at the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY. The trial on the plaintiff's fraud claim will commence on Thursday, July 7, 2016. The Clerk o f the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions at ECF 71 and 74. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/30/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 219, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 6/24/2016) (kko)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?