U.S. Bank National Association v. PHL Variable Insurance Company et al

Plaintiff: U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant: PHL Variable Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2013cv01580
Filed: March 8, 2013
Court: New York Southern District Court
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Colleen McMahon
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 22, 2015 210 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION AND ORDER re: 182 MOTION in Limine Nos. 1-6. filed by PHL Variable Insurance Company, 179 MOTION in Limine . filed by U.S. Bank National Association.For the reasons stated herein: Phoenix's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; U.S. Bank's first motion in limine is DENIED; U.S. Bank's second motion in limine is GRANTED; U.S. Bank's third motion in limine is DENIED; U.S. Bank's fourth motion in limine is DENIE D; U.S. Bank's fifth motion in limine is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that paragraphs III(1), VI, VI(1-3), VI(6), and VII(16) of Foster's report and related testimony are excluded and is otherwise DENIED; U.S. Bank's sixth m otion in limine DENIED without prejudice to renewal at trial; U.S. Bank's seventh motion in limine is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth more fully in the opinion; Phoenix's first month in limine is GRANTED IN PART to t he extent that Plaintiff's Exhibit #32 is excluded and is otherwise DENIED; Phoenix's second motion in limine is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that Plaintiff's Exhibits ##33, 44, 44A, and 71 are excluded and is otherwise DENIED; Phoenix's third motion in limine is DENIED; Phoenix's fourth motion in limine is DENIED; Phoenix's fifth motion in limine is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth more fully in the opinion; Phoenix's sixth moti on in limine is DENIED. (As further set forth in this Order.) The Clerk of the Court is directed to remove the motions as Docket ##179, 182 in No. 13 Civ. 1580 and Docket ##386, 389, 398 in No. 12 Civ. 6811 from the court's list of pending motions. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 6/22/2015) (kgo)
October 3, 2013 81 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 58 Motion to Preclude; denying 61 Motion to Compel: For the foregoing reasons, PHL's motion to preclude (Docket no. 253 in 12 Civ. 6811, Docket no. 58 in 13 Civ. 1580) is denied. PHL's motion to compel (Dock et no. 256 in 12 Civ. 6811, Docket no. 61 in 13 Civ. 1580) is denied without prejudice to PHL submitting a letter demonstrating the relevance of the non-privileged information it seeks within three days of the date of this Order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 10/3/2013) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: U.S. Bank National Association v. PHL Variable Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank National Association
Represented By: Steven J. Fink
Represented By: Stephen G. Foresta
Represented By: Philipp Smaylovsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHL Variable Insurance Company
Represented By: Jason H. Gould
Represented By: Stephen J. Jorden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?