Ramos v. Jodi Bus Consolidated
Plaintiff: Jose Ramos
Defendant: Jodi Bus Consolidated
Case Number: 1:2013cv01672
Filed: March 12, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Bronx
Presiding Judge: P. Kevin Castel
Presiding Judge: Henry B. Pitman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss. The defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. (Docket # 13.) The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion and enter judgment for the defendant. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 10/31/2013) (ja)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramos v. Jodi Bus Consolidated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Ramos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jodi Bus Consolidated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?