180 Varick,LLC, v. Think Passenger,Inc.,
Plaintiff: 180 Varick,LLC,
Defendant: Think Passenger,Inc.,
Case Number: 1:2013cv02138
Filed: April 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Katherine B Forrest
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2013 FED EX sent on 6/21/2013 was inadvertently sent to State Court- Supreme and returned to the Southern District of New York on 8/28/2013. CASE RE-REMANDED OUT from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the State Court - Civil Court of the State of New York, County of New York (111 Centre Street). Sent certified copy of docket entries and remand order. Mailed via Federal Express AIRBILL # 8013 4767 6094 on 8/28/2013. (tro)
June 20, 2013 CASE REMANDED OUT from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the State Court - Civil Court of the State of New York, County of New York. Sent certified copy of docket entries and remand order. Mailed via Federal Express AIRBILL # 8029-2829-6655 on 6/21/2013. (js)
June 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: #103315 re: #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court. For the reasons set forth above, plaintiffs motion to remand is GRANTED. Its motion for attorney's fees and costs is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at ECF No.5 and to remand this case to the Civil Court of the City of New York. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 6/20/2013) (js) Modified on 6/27/2013 (jab).
June 20, 2013 Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #19 Memorandum & Opinion,, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (js)
June 18, 2013 Filing 18 LETTER addressed to Judge Katherine B. Forrest from Jeffrey Klarsfeld dated 6/18/13 re: This office is counsel to Plaintiff 180 Varick, LLC ("Plaintiff") in the above referenced action. We respond to the Court's Order dated June 11, 2013 (ECF document 17). Document filed by 180 Varick,LLC.(mro)
June 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, not later than Friday, June 14, 2013, plaintiff shall submit a letter (via PDF email attachment to ForrestNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov, copying all counsel) detailing the citizenship of each of its members for the purposes of diversity jurisdiction. The letter shall also state plaintiffs position as to whether the amount in controversy in this action is greater than $75,000, and shall explain its good faith basis for this position. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 6/11/2013) (mro)
June 5, 2013 Filing 16 Letter addressed to Judge Katherine B. Forrest from Jeffrey Klarsfeld dated 6/4/2013 re: Counsel requests that the Court schedule an initial per-trial conference so that the parties can address these and other issues pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and the Court's Individual Practice Rules. Document filed by 180 Varick, LLC.(mro)
May 10, 2013 Filing 15 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court.. Document filed by 180 Varick,LLC,. (Klarsfeld, Jeffrey)
May 3, 2013 Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court.. Document filed by Think Passenger,Inc.,. (Cohen, Dennis)
April 30, 2013 Filing 13 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent 180 Varick Street Corporation for 180 Varick,LLC,. Document filed by 180 Varick,LLC,.(Klarsfeld, Jeffrey)
April 29, 2013 Filing 12 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE NOT ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.. Document filed by 180 Varick,LLC,.(Klarsfeld, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/29/2013 (lb).
April 29, 2013 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney Jeffrey Howard Klarsfeld to RE-FILE Document #12 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. ERROR(S): Corporate Parents were not added. Please re-file this document and when prompted: Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?, select the YES radio button and enter the Corporate Parent(s) or Affiliate(s). (lb)
April 25, 2013 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney Jeffrey Howard Klarsfeld to RE-FILE Document #11 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. ERROR(S): Corporate Parents were not added. Please re-file this document and when prompted: Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?, select the YES radio button and enter the Corporate Parent(s) or Affiliate(s). (lb)
April 24, 2013 Filing 11 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE NOT ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.. Document filed by 180 Varick,LLC,.(Klarsfeld, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/25/2013 (lb).
April 22, 2013 Filing 10 ANSWER to #4 Counterclaim. Document filed by 180 Varick,LLC,.(Klarsfeld, Jeffrey)
April 17, 2013 Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Notice of Motion on April 16, 2013. Document filed by 180 Varick,LLC,. (Klarsfeld, Jeffrey)
April 16, 2013 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - EVENT TYPE ERROR. Note to Attorney Jeffrey Howard Klarsfeld to RE-FILE Document #8 Affidavit in Support of Motion. Use the event type Affidavit of Service Other found under the event list Service of Process. (ldi)
April 16, 2013 Filing 8 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - AFFIDAVIT of Affidavit of Service in Support re: #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court.. Document filed by 180 Varick,LLC,. (Klarsfeld, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/17/2013 (ldi).
April 16, 2013 Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court.. Document filed by 180 Varick,LLC,. (Klarsfeld, Jeffrey)
April 16, 2013 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT in Support re: #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court.. Document filed by 180 Varick,LLC,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Klarsfeld, Jeffrey)
April 16, 2013 Filing 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court. Document filed by 180 Varick,LLC,.(Klarsfeld, Jeffrey)
April 8, 2013 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal)., COUNTERCLAIM against 180 Varick,LLC,. Document filed by Think Passenger,Inc.,. (Cohen, Dennis)
April 5, 2013 Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Think Passenger,Inc.,.(Cohen, Dennis)
April 5, 2013 Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Filing Notice of Filing Notice of Removal with Civil Court. Document filed by Think Passenger,Inc.,. (Cohen, Dennis)
April 1, 2013 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Civil Court, County of New York. Case Number: 58811/2013. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 465401063874).Document filed by Think Passenger,Inc.,.(mn)
April 1, 2013 Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV is so designated. (mn)
April 1, 2013 Case Designated ECF. (mn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 180 Varick,LLC, v. Think Passenger,Inc.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 180 Varick,LLC,
Represented By: Jeffrey Howard Klarsfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Think Passenger,Inc.,
Represented By: Dennis O. Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?