Blakley et al v. Lew et al
| The Estate of John E. Long, The Estate of Virginia E. Long, John Keith Blakley and Rhonda L. Blakley |
| Jacob E. Lew and Steven T. Miller |
| 1:2013cv02140 |
| April 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Jesse M. Furman |
| Taxes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 30 SECOND MOTION to Transfer Case to District of Columbia if venue rejected for SDNY. filed by The Estate of Virginia E. Long, Rhonda L. Blakley, John Keith Blakley, The Estate of John E. Long, 22 MOTION to Dismiss of Transfer. filed by Jacob E. Lew, Daniel Werfel, 17 FIRST MOTION for Mediation. filed by The Estate of Virginia E. Long, Rhonda L. Blakley, John Keith Blakley, The Estate of John E. Long. For the reasons stated above, Defendants m otion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Nos. 22 and 30. The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate Docket No. 17 as moot. In addition, Plaintiffs' request for a case management teleconference (Docket No. 34, Attachment 1) is denied as moot. Finally, the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 12/30/2013) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
