LG Electronics, Inc. et al v. Wi-LAN USA, Inc. et al
| LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. |
| Wi-LAN USA, Inc. and Wi-LAN, Inc. |
| 1:2013cv02237 |
| April 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
OPINION AND ORDER re: 52 MOTION to Stay Execution of Judgment Compelling Arbitration Pending Appeal. filed by LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. LG has not shown a strong likelihood of success on the merits of its appeal, nor any irreparable harm absent a stay. LG has also not shown that a stay would be sufficiently protective of Wi-LAN's interests or those of the public. For these reasons, LG's motion for a stay of this Court's judgment pending appeal is denied. The Clerk of this Court is respectfully requested to close the motion pending at docket entry 52. SO ORDERED. (As further set forth within this Order.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 7/29/2015) (ajs)
|
|
Filing
50
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Wi-LAN's motion to compel arbitration is granted and LG's request for declaratory and injunctive relief is denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 7/21/2014) (ja)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
