Egleston et al v. Vega et al
| Carys I. Egleston and Claudia S. Egleston |
| Ernesto Vega and Wal-Mart De Mexico SAB De CV |
| 1:2013cv02282 |
| April 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Victor Marrero |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
OPINION AND ORDER re: 118 MOTION to Alter Judgment re: 116 Memorandum & Opinion,, 117 Clerk's Judgment, filed by Michael Fogel. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Docket Number 118. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/21/2018) (mro)
|
|
Filing
116
OPINION AND ORDER re: 96 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint filed by Wal-Mart De Mexico SAB De CV, Ernesto Vega, Scot Rank, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 100 MOTION to Strike Document No. 98 filed by Mic hael Fogel. For the reasons outlined above, Defendants' motion to dismiss the SAC for failure to state a claim is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendants' appendices, though it is mooted given this result, is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close this case. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/27/2017) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
