Leadgate S.A. v. C=Holdings B.V.
Leadgate S.A. |
C=Holdings B.V. |
1:2013cv02376 |
April 9, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of U.S. |
Richard J Sullivan |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff Leadgate S.A. and their counsel hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant 13 Civ. 2376. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 2/12/2014) (mro) |
Filing 19 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Richard J. Sullivan from Martin F. Gusy dated 2/10/2014 re: Because C=Holdings has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment in this case, we expect Plaintiff Leadgate to file a notice of dismissal of the Amended Complaint in short order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). ENDORSEMENT: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff shall, no later than February 14, 2014, file a notice of dismissal or advise the Court that it wishes to proceed with this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 2/10/2014) (ama) |
Filing 18 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) C=Holdings B.V.. Document filed by Leadgate S.A.. (Hantman, Robert) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned counsel, the attorneys of record for Plaintiff Leadgate S.A. and for Defendant C=Holdings B.V., that the Court's deadline for the parties to submit a joint letter of no more than six single-spaced pages informing the Court of how they wish to proceed is extended to January 31, 2014. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 1/06/2014) (ama) |
Filing 16 ORDER: In light of the Court's recent ruling in the related action C=Holdings, B. V v. Asiarim Corp., 12 Civ. 928 (RJS), the parties shall submit, no later than January 3, 2014, a joint letter of no more than six single-spaced pages informing the Court of how they wish to proceed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 12/17/2013) (ama) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Martin Frederik Gusy on behalf of C=Holdings B.V.. New Address: Cozen O'Connor, 45 Broadway, 16th Floor, New York, NY, USA 10006, 2125099400. (Gusy, Martin) |
Filing 14 ORDER: Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's pre-motion letter no later than Wednesday, September 4, 2013. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 8/30/2013) (cd) |
Filing 12 ORDER: At a conference held on July 12, 2013, the Court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss the Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but granted Plaintiff leave to amend the Complaint no later than July 29, 2013. Plaintiff has not amended the Complaint. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 7/30/2013) (ama) |
Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint against C=Holdings B.V. Document filed by Leadgate S.A. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Leadgate S.A. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3)(ja) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard J. Sullivan: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 7/24/2013. Attorneys Justin Swartz and Sally Abrahamson were present for Plaintiffs. Attorneys Felice Ekelman and Adam Gross were present for Defendants. (mro) |
Filing 11 ORDER: For the reasons stated on the record at the July 12, 2013 conference, Defendant's motion to dismiss the Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is deemed made and GRANTED. However, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend the Complaint no later than July 29, 2013. If Plaintiff does not amend by that date, this case will be terminated. SO ORDERED. ( Amended Pleadings due by 7/29/2013.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 7/15/2013) (ama) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard J. Sullivan: Status Conference held on 7/12/2013. The Court held a status conference on July 12, 2013 in Courtroom 21C with Judge Richard J. Sullivan presiding. The Court granted Defendants motion to dismiss, but left Plaintiffs leave to amend. Attorney Robert J Hantman was present for Plaintiff. Attorney Martin Frederik Gusy was present for Defendant. (djc) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard J. Sullivan: Status Conference held on 7/12/2013. The Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss, but left Plaintiffs leave to amend. Attorney Robert J Hantman was present for Plaintiff. Attorney Martin Frederik Gusy was present for Defendant. (mro) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carl Maria Reinier Van Der Zandt on behalf of C=Holdings B.V.. (Van Der Zandt, Carl) |
Filing 9 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Richard J. Sullivan from Zachary A. Kozak dated 5/30/2013 re: This firm is counsel to the plaintiff, Leadgate S.A., in the above captioned matter. In accordance with the May 30, 2013 e-mail from Chambers and the Court's Individual Rules of Practice, kindly accept this letter requesting an adjournment of the May 31, 2013 Preliminary Conference in this matter. ENDORSEMENT: The conference is adjourned until Friday, July 12, 2013 at 12:30 p.m. The joint letter and case management plan should be submitted no later than June 28, 2013. SO ORDERED., ( Status Conference set for 7/12/2013 at 12:30 PM before Judge Richard J. Sullivan.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 5/30/2013) (ama) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Martin Frederik Gusy on behalf of C=Holdings B.V. (Gusy, Martin) |
Filing 7 ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter, dated April 18,2013, requesting that 12 Civ. 928 proceed to trial as scheduled on May 6, 2013 and that 13 Civ. 2376 proceed on a separate schedule. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that trial in 12 Civ. 928 will proceed as previously ordered. An initial conference will be scheduled in 13 Civ. 2376 in a separate order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 4/25/2013) (ama) |
Filing 6 ORDER: The parties are HEREBY ORDERED to appear for a status conference on Friday, May 31,2013, at 2:15 p.m. in Courtroom 905 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. SO ORDERED. ( Status Conference set for 5/31/2013 at 02:15 PM in Courtroom 905, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Richard J. Sullivan.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 4/25/2013) (ama) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties submit a joint letter no later than 4/22/2013 advising the Court as to whether trial in 12 Civ. 928 may proceed and outlining the contemplated discovery schedule in 13 Civ. 2376. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 4/17/2013) (tro) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties to the above- captioned actions shall submit a joint letter to the Court no later than April 19, 2013 advising the Court of the impact of the newly filed action on the pending action, which is scheduled to proceed to trial on May 6, 2013. Specifically, the parties should determine the time line for discovery in the new action and whether trial in the pending action should be delayed so that these actions may be tried together. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 4/12/2013) (tro) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to Judge Richard J. Sullivan. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (pgu) |
CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:12-cv-00928-RJS. Notice of Assignment to follow. (pgu) |
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. (pgu) |
Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Leadgate S.A..(Hantman, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against C=Holdings B.V.. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 465401064541)Document filed by Leadgate S.A..(cde) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/10/2013: #1 complaint, part 2, #2 complaint, part 3) (jd). |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to C=Holdings B.V.. (cde) |
Case Designated ECF. (cde) |
CASE REFERRED TO Judge Richard J. Sullivan as possibly related to 1:12-cv-0928. (cde) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Leadgate S.A. v. C=Holdings B.V. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Leadgate S.A. | |
Represented By: | Robert J Hantman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: C=Holdings B.V. | |
Represented By: | Martin Frederik Gusy |
Represented By: | Carl Maria Reinier Van Der Zandt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.