Scholastic Corporation et al v. Palmer Kane L.L.C.

Plaintiff: Scholastic Inc. and Scholastic Corporation
Defendant: Palmer Kane L.L.C.
Case Number: 1:2013cv02589
Filed: April 19, 2013
Court: New York Southern District Court
Office: Foley Square Office
County: NewYork
Presiding Judge: Thomas P. Griesa
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scholastic Corporation et al v. Palmer Kane L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scholastic Inc.
Represented By: Edward Henry Rosenthal
Represented By: Beth Ilana Goldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scholastic Corporation
Represented By: Edward Henry Rosenthal
Represented By: Beth Ilana Goldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Palmer Kane L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.