Sesa v. Colvin
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 15, 2016
ORDER for 35 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Janine J. Sesa, 52 Report and Recommendations. Having received no objection to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn's June 1, 2016 report and recommendation, the Court reviewed the recommendation and found no "clear error on the face of the record." Walker v. Vaughn, 216 F.Supp.2d 290, 292 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (quoting Urena v. New York, 160 F.Supp.2d 606, 609-10 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)) (internal quotation marks omitted). Accordingly, the C ourt accepts and adopts the thorough and well-reasoned report and recommendation, awarding Plaintiff $9,913.44 in attorney's fees and $398.41 in costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/15/2016) (cf)
|August 6, 2014
OPINION AND ORDER re: 20 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed by Carolyn Colvin, 12 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed by Janine J. Sesa. For the reasons discussed above, the Commissioner's determination that Sesa w as not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act during the period May 6, 2010, to September 12, 2011, is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED and the Defendant's cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 8/5/2014) Copies Sent By Chambers. (ja)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?