Magnotta v. Putnam County Sheriff et al
| Maurizio Magnotta |
| Inv. DePerno, Putnam County Sheriff, Duchess County Sheriff, Inv. Tricinelli, Inv. Nalvone, Det. Cuddebank, Det. Haire, Det. Locascio and Det. Owens |
| 1:2013cv02752 |
| April 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Greene |
| George B. Daniels |
| Gabriel W. Gorenstein |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER adopting 83 Report and Recommendations, 46 Motion to Dismiss filed by Det. Cuddebank, Det. Haire, Duchess County Sheriff, Dutchess County, 56 Motion to Dismiss filed by Amato, Inv. DePerno, Inv. Nalvone, Napolitano , Putnam County Sheriff, Inv. Tricinelli, Putnam County, 52 Motion to Dismiss filed by Det. Owens, Det. Locascio. Before this Court is Magistrate Judge Gorenstein's February 25, 2014 Report and Recommendation ("Report") in which he recommended that this Court grant Defendants' motions to dismiss. See ECF No. 83. This Court adopts the Report in its entirety. Each Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at ECF Nos. 46, 52, and 56. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 4/17/2014) (mro) Modified on 4/17/2014 (mro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
