1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East v. South Bronx Metal Health Council, Inc.
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 3, 2013
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 24 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. The Court directs the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the amount of $501,298.69 in back pay, $4,647.00 in attorney's fees, and $610.00 in costs, for a total monetary judgment of $506,555.69. The Clerk is also directed to close all pending motions. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/2/2013) (djc)
|November 13, 2013
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 1 Complaint filed by 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East: For the reasons set forth above, I recommend that SEIU be awarded $501,298.69 in back pay due under the federal and NY WARN Acts, $4,647.00 in at torneys' fees, and $610.00 in costs, for a total monetary award of $506,555.69. Pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 636(b)(1) and Rules 72, 6(a), and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have fourteen (14) days fr om this date to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation. Such objection shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court, with extra copies delivered to the chambers of the Honorable John G. Koeltl, Room 1030, and to the chambers of the u ndersigned, Room 1960, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. Failure to file timely objections will preclude appellate review. Objections to R&R due by 12/2/2013 (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 11/13/2013) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tn)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?